Middle of the Road
My freshman year of college I took a world religions class. The professor who taught the section on Eastern Religions was a very funny man, and I really enjoyed his teaching, so much that I took his class on Buddhism a few years later. He has an analogy that he used in both classes that he called “The five martini effect.” It goes like this: The first martini is pretty good. The second martini is great. The third martini is fantastic! The fourth is okay. The fifth…. LIVING DEATH!!!! He used this analogy to teach what many Buddhists call the “Middle of the Road” mentality that was the real beginning of the Buddha’s enlightenment. He said that if he could just get himself to stop on the third martini he would be a much happier man. Because human nature insists on having more he won’t naturally stop when he should, but instead must cultivate control over himself and learn when his needs are met. He must learn to walk down the middle of the road.
I had a roommate who was becoming dissatisfied with her weight. She tried to lose weight by not eating anything sweet, and exercising a lot. It didn’t work. She would often get frustrated and eat a cookie then a few minutes later find she had eaten the whole pack. I told her the five martini story and tried to convince her that she didn’t need to deny herself of everything. She liked the idea and was able (by shouting “MIDDLE OF THE ROAD” outloud to herself) eat only two or three cookies every day instead of a pack of cookies twice a week.
The story of the Buddha’s realisation of this teaching is very interesting, (and I’m going to tell it from memory so parts may be a bit off). The Buddha was born to a king, and was named Siddartha. Shortly after birth he was taken to an oracle who prophecied that he would either be a great king or a great holy man who would allieviate the sufferings of many. His father wanted his son to be a great king, so he attempted to control his son’s reality and not let him be exposed to suffering by keeping him in the palace. Eventually Siddartha got out and saw three things, an old person, a sick person and a dead person. This shook him up pretty good and he thought that his whole life was a lie. Then he saw an renunciate, a man who lived in the woods, not eating and meditating all the time. He went and joined them and became the most hard-core renunciate they had ever seen. He had a little group of followers, and would sit under a tree meditating for days. He could grab his spine through the front of his stomach because he had eaten so little. One day a lady went to give an offering of rice to a tree god that she thought lived in the tree near her house. She found Siddartha sitting under the tree, assumed he was the tree-god and gave him the offering. Siddartha came out of his trance, saw the rice and ate some. All the sudden life the universe and everything became clear to him. At this point he became the Buddha and he taught that enlightenment isn’t found in extremes, it’s found in moderation.
As mormons we tend to shy away from the idea of moderation. To us moderation means you can have a few drinks. You shouldn’t give all that we have to the church. We shouldn’t expect to perfect. We make the mistake of thinking that moderation as a life principle applies to situations that are either too specific, or too broad. We tend to view it as an excuse to get out of things that we think are too hard. In fact ‘moderation’ can be a very very harsh task master. Consider the idea of food in a moderate lifestyle. If I eat and drink only what I need, then I will never drink alcohol because I do not need it. Spices and flavorings are wasteful and distracting. Furthermore I will never eat more than I need to function, which happens to be less than I eat to feel full, probably just one bowl of rice every day. If I need to eat more than that, then perhaps I am not being moderate enough in my activities.
Perhaps the idea that ‘moderation’ is really trying to convey is a deep sense of balance. We take energy in, and we spend energy, physically, mentally and spiritually. We take in food, then we burn calories. We sleep, relax and play, then we work, think and cope. We pray, study the scriptures and meditate, then are tempted, suffer and struggle. The tricky thing is, all of this is interconnected in a sticky web of incoming and outgoing traffic. The cookies I eat give me energy and help me relax. If I eat too many then I have too much energy, and that causes stress by weight gain, and guilt, and pent up sugar highs.
I believe that we try to compartmentalize our lives too much. We are complete beings, and our eternal salvation isn’t based only on how well we know the scriptures, but by how well we live with our bodies, our families, our neighbors and coworkers. Ignoring my family so I can pray all day will not lead me to the Celestial Kingdom. My ’spiritual’ progression isn’t just my spirit it is all of me. If one part genuinely improves all parts improve with it. If I focus on one part of me at the expense of the others then my efforts are wasted because the part that is lagging drags all of me down with it. It’s a complex balancing act, where excess or lack in any area can set the whole thing askew. It is also highly individualized, and we cannot compare our needs to the needs of others. Maybe I need to meditate for an hour everyday, while my neighbor just needs a few minutes in the shower.
With guidance from the spirit we can achieve perfect balance and eventually become perfect beings.
April 12th, 2006 12:12
I was surprised by your assertion that Mormons tend to shy away from moderation. That’s exactly the opposite of what I grew up with. My impression is that moderation is something the church encourages. “All things in moderation” is a phrase I heard often growing up in the church and the idea was very much like the “five martini” analogy you mentioned.
April 12th, 2006 12:40
PDoE, I based that asertation on president Oaks CES address from May ‘05. He said: “As I conclude my five examples, I need to issue a caution. The principle I have espoused, that we should pursue steady dedication and avoid frenzied excesses, could be understood as implying that we should have “moderation in all things.” Not so. The Savior has commanded us to serve with all our “heart, might, mind and strength” (D&C 4:2), to “seek . . . earnestly the riches of eternity” (D&C 68:31), and to be “valiant in the testimony of Jesus” (D&C 76:79). He has also told us that if we are lukewarm, He will spue us out of His mouth (see Revelation 3:16). The thrust of my examples is that we should be steadfast and consistent in our dedication, our commitment, and our efforts.”
I will admit that I haven’t heard similar things in sunday school, but at the same time I haven’t heard “moderation in all things” mentioned in sunday school either. I more often hear people being told to put everything into [X] or to be perfect in [Y]. Often that is interpreted as I need to do [X] until my eyes bleed.
April 12th, 2006 17:50
Nice post.
I kind of agree with pdoe. I have always heard the moderation in all things. I have heard the other as well.
My feel is that there are a few things that need to be pretty absolute. Certain things we need to do pretty much perfectly, and if not repent fast. Certain things that we must never do, and if so repent fast. But other that this relatively small list of absolutes, the rest is a great balancing act. I think both approaches are needed as far as they are properly applied.
April 13th, 2006 07:12
Yes I have always grown up with the concept of moderation in all things, and balance. The hard part is trying to figure out where that balance and moedration lies. Yes we are to serve with all our hearts,might, mind, and strength, but we also have to have that balance or we will not be able to do what we need to do.
April 13th, 2006 12:13
Starfoxy, thanks for your insights into a challenge that we all face every day. Your distinction between ways of interpreting “moderation” particularly struck a chord for me. I’m now trying to remember if, like PDoE, Eric, and Tigersue, I have grown up with exhortations to “moderation in all things” in the sense of middle of the road, and just forgotten that–I forget a lot of things these days
— or if “dedication to Lord within a ‘balanced’ life” is closer to the concept I feel I have heard stressed.
Upon consideration, I realize that the times I have been most at peace were probably times when, even in the midst of great stress and hectic activity, the deeper balance you referred to was actually present.
I continue to yearn for that perfect balance, but somehow seem to succumb too often to subtle, as well blatant temptations to ignore the guidance of the Spirit upon which it depends. This thread has strengthened my resolve to solidify some changes in my daily routine which I have been prompted to make (regarding diet, exercise, journal keeping, blogging, and Scripture study), but which have not yet become solid habits. Thanks for a powerful reminder that I will be even happier when I let the Spirit guide me to better balance in my life.
April 14th, 2006 05:04
Starfoxy,
Funny. I picked up Sidhartha a couple of weeks ago off my book shelf to read while exercising. In my book though, after fasting in the forest for so long, Sidhartha decides to go to the other extreme, partying like its 1999, getting really fat, and livin’ it up with the ladies. Its not until after that he decides that moderation is the key and becomes enlightened.
I know some mormons who have done the same thing.
April 14th, 2006 09:24
To those of you who swear by being taught moderation in all things-
Have you ever felt the guilt that comes along with resenting a calling because you didn’t say no even though at a time that you really couldn’t handle another thing on your plate?
The teaching is out there, moderation in all things,m but the reality is that if we don’t do everything that is expected, many times there is a consequence of guilt. ie, “ugh, i’m such a bad person…i haven’t read my scriptures for a week.” “ugh, i’m such a bad mormon, cause I didn’t make it to the temple once a month last year.” “UGH, what a bad friend I am ’cause I didn’t read that sister’s mind and automatically respond with a hand delivered message/slash/gift/slash/lamenated something or other just to let her know I care.”
If you can moderate and not feel guilty then you have reached the real point of enlightenment.